© 1999 - 2026Advanta-STAR Automotive Research, all rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America (Advanta-STAR). If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it, or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. Removal of this watermark/notification without prior written license and approval received from Advanta-STAR is an agreement, understanding, and/or stipulation by the person(s), entities, agents, attorneys, and any other persons involved in the removal of this watermark/notification (including but not limited to Search Optics, LLC and any and all parent entities, sister entities, and subsidiary entities of Search Optics, LLC and/or any other entity, agent, attorney, and persons related in any manner to Search Optics, LLC) to: 1) an agreed upon amount of liquidated monetary damages of a minimum of $1,250,000.00 US Dollars in favor of Advanta-STAR; 2) the jurisdiction and enforcement of any legal claims associated with this matter asserted by Advanta-STAR in the United States Federal District Court in Portand, Oregon; and 3) service of process of any legal claims asserted by Advanta-STAR associated with this matter may be accomplished by First-Class Postage by the United States Postal Service or comparable service. 01AWS-2V8RS 2a06:98c0:3600::103 2026/04/21
The Cayenne handles at 1.02 G’s, while the Cullinan pulls only .83 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.
The Cayenne GTS executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 3.3 seconds quicker than the Cullinan Black Badge (23.3 seconds @ .87 average G’s vs. 26.6 seconds @ .68 average G’s).
For better maneuverability, the Cayenne’s turning circle is 3.6 feet tighter than the Cullinan’s (39.7 feet vs. 43.3 feet).
For greater off-road capability the Cayenne E-Hybrid has a 1.4 inches greater minimum ground clearance than the Cullinan (8.2 vs. 6.8 inches), allowing the Cayenne to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged. The Cayenne Turbo E-Hybrid’s minimum ground clearance is 2.8 inches higher than on the Cullinan (9.6 vs. 6.8 inches).
The Porsche Cayenne may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 650 to 1350 pounds less than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan.
The Cayenne is 1 foot, 4.7 inches shorter than the Cullinan, making the Cayenne easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.
The Cayenne 4x4 is 6.3 inches shorter in height than the Cullinan, making the Cayenne much easier to wash and garage and drive (lower center of gravity).
For excellent aerodynamics, the Cayenne has standard flush composite headlights. The Cullinan has recessed headlights that spoil its aerodynamic shape and create extra drag.
The front grille of the Cayenne uses electronically controlled shutters to close off airflow and reduce drag when less engine cooling is needed. This helps improve highway fuel economy. The Cullinan doesn’t offer active grille shutters.